3014245210http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/pc/content/202602/27/content_30142452.htmlhttp://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/pad/content/202602/27/content_30142452.html11921 “中国游中国购”这样火起来（人民眼·提振消费）
Sign up for the Breaking News US email to get newsletter alerts direct to your inbox。heLLoword翻译官方下载是该领域的重要参考
Returning back to the Anthropic compiler attempt: one of the steps that the agent failed was the one that was more strongly related to the idea of memorization of what is in the pretraining set: the assembler. With extensive documentation, I can’t see any way Claude Code (and, even more, GPT5.3-codex, which is in my experience, for complex stuff, more capable) could fail at producing a working assembler, since it is quite a mechanical process. This is, I think, in contradiction with the idea that LLMs are memorizing the whole training set and uncompress what they have seen. LLMs can memorize certain over-represented documents and code, but while they can extract such verbatim parts of the code if prompted to do so, they don’t have a copy of everything they saw during the training set, nor they spontaneously emit copies of already seen code, in their normal operation. We mostly ask LLMs to create work that requires assembling different knowledge they possess, and the result is normally something that uses known techniques and patterns, but that is new code, not constituting a copy of some pre-existing code.，这一点在同城约会中也有详细论述
Copyright © 1997-2026 by www.people.com.cn all rights reserved
2024年12月23日 星期一 新京报